We may have lost this year, but come 2012, we will emerge stronger than ever. We will revive the Reagan Revolution. We will win the next battle in the culture war.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
MY FRIENDS, THE CULTURE WAR IS NOT OVER
We may have lost this year, but come 2012, we will emerge stronger than ever. We will revive the Reagan Revolution. We will win the next battle in the culture war.
Monday, November 3, 2008
Can they get any lower? Hell yeah.
I don't know who this is, but who the [expletive] do you think you are? Starting your own anti-Obama group on facebook? How redneck are you? Obama can change this country for the better, and if you can't respect that, then go [expletive] yourself. You're an evil person and you should go straight to hell for dissing Obama like that. All you rednecks should go straight to hell for that matter. Are you against black people? Is that it? Cause let me tell you as an African-American person, the people who I hate the most are racists, and that is what you are. You deserve to be shot in the head you [expletive]. Take your little racist anti-Obama group, and shove it straight up your [expletive] you [expletive] [expletive] redneck. When Obama is announced the new president of the United States, I hope you and all other anti-Obama haters just kill themselves, because I don't like people who think like you. Narrow minded [expletive] are why we still have racism in this country, but I bet you like that don't you. I bet you like black people being put in jail or arrested on the street for no reason. I bet you say the N-word everyday don't you? You're a [expletive]. Get out of America. It's people like you that make our country look bad toward the rest of the world.I will let you, the reader, decide what to make of this. It is people like this fellow who make me die a little inside as I read their messages.
[EXPLETIVE]!!!
Remember this.
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Help from the Gut
Monday, October 27, 2008
Follow Up: 10/27 Pinhead
Sucker Punched Pt. 2
Like print newspapers and newspaper websites, blogs can gain reputations based on its content, ideologies, and presentation. For example, blogging infused with malicious sarcasm, like http://stopbarackobama-group.blogspot.com/ will hopefully not gain respect from most readers. This particular blog responds to and dismisses readers’ objections to its content more than it posts original content. It also consistently calls its objectors stupid, in one way or another. This demonstrates the importance of readers’ ability to comment on blogs, and its effect on journalism. If a blogger responds to readers’ comments by churning low blows to their level of intelligence, the blogger will undermine his or her own purposes. The “Stop Obama” blog will not persuade supporters of Obama to change their minds by calling his supporters dumb. Though this blog provides readers with news, its loyalty is not to “the citizens” but rather to “the cause.” Perhaps that is the difference between blogging and journalistic blogging.Click here to read the original post.
Art or a Churlish Act?
.jpg)
Sunday, October 26, 2008
NO Tough Questions!
FOX NEWS: 'Obama Campaign Cuts Off Interviews With Florida TV Stations'
Watch the interview:
Biden Angered By Tough Questions
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Friday, October 24, 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Orson Scott Card asks the question...
http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/081017light.html
If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.
If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.
If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate.
Because that's what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don't like the probable consequences. That's what honesty means . That's how trust is earned.If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats — including Barack Obama — and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans — then you are not journalists by any standard.
You're just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it's time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Brace Yourselves!
"Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."Oh boy can't wait.
Monday, October 20, 2008
'Family Guy' in the tank
Friday, October 17, 2008
Vote Obama, or else you are a RACIST!
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Joe on MSNBC
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Debate Tonite...no drunken commentary.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Raving Loons on the Factor...Again
"Ein Volk, Ein BarReich, Ein Obama"
"Her son, she said, doesn't understand her concern.Obviously the schools are becoming successful in brainwashing the youth..."Give me the youth, and Germany will rule the World" - Adolf Hitler
"It worries me that, you know, he's in eighth grade and already he's thinking that Obama is just going to win because everybody likes him," she said. "Why in a school does everybody like him? I've got to believe there are kids who like McCain too.""
"But the left realizes that if you want to kill a legitimate line of questioning, simply call something racist or hateful - and the media nods. It's the best way to make sure McCain loses gracefully – and it's working.
Frankly, I'd say it makes them all worse than Hitler."
Mickey Endorses Obama

Monday, October 13, 2008
Obama, of Sherwood Forest
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Introducing our next VP...John McCain!
Monday, October 6, 2008
'Obama Frat'
Saturday, October 4, 2008
Why do the American people trust Obama with the economy?
Obama – 47%
McCain – 37%
Do these numbers worry anyone else? McCain’s gaffe during the Republican primary season aside, since when have we trusted a man who leans so far left of center with our money?
Obama wants to give tax credits to the American people. This is much different from cutting taxes (as much as he denies it) because money must first be taken in by the government before it is paid out. Obama’s plans sound like welfare for those of us who don’t need it.
There are plenty of people who find it appropriate, even necessary, that we tax the rich in order to even out the distribution of wealth in America, as if the vast majority of those we call rich have lied, cheated and stolen in order to acquire their wealth. Or that all the rich have simply come about their money by way of inheritance, and therefore do not deserve it. Do we really believe this, as Americans? Polls seem to indicate that we do.
America is a meritocracy. We rise and fall by our own hands. We believe that all men are created equal, not that they are equally entitled to the fruits of one another’s labors. Yet here we are, as a combined group of some three hundred million people, leaning in the direction of a man who does not believe in merit, but in handouts. In taking from one group, whether they like it or not, and forcing them to give to another. Is that America? Is this a country that forcibly rips the gains of one group of people and hands them to another?
Taking from the rich does not benefit anyone in the long term. For the time being it feels good to have the extra cash in hand, but the unseen effects of such policies are great: reduced innovation, a stagnant standard of living. These are the true costs of taxing the “rich.” For some reason people seem to believe that they are not living as good of lives as they were in the past. This is a very peculiar idea, because just fifteen years ago the Internet was still in its infancy. Now, we use it for our everyday lives – to make hotel reservations, purchase tickets, buy clothes, read our news…in short, do everything. Go back to the 1930’s and 40’s, and see how many people owned a color television set. Or a car with a GPS. Innovation increases our standard of living in a way that mere numbers can’t convey – and by taxing the rich and corporations, the incentive to innovate disappears. After all, why innovate if you won’t see any reward? If people are out to help one another, why haven’t all the communal societies of the past produced the technological advances of the United States? Why didn’t the Soviet Union turn out as the superpower of the 20th Century, and the hegemon of the 21st?
I’ll leave off this post with one final thought: if you look back in history, you’ll see another government that actively gave the people money out of the government coffers – the Roman Empire. If the people wish to be coddled, as the citizens of Rome were coddled, that is their right to do so. But we ought to keep in mind the lessons of that time, notably the result that followed.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Sing Praises for...Obama?
(and if you disagree with me, you sir are worse than Hitler!)
Teachers <3 Obama

Read First:
FOX NEWS: "Virginia Teachers Union Sparks Outrage With 'Obama Blue Day'"
Monday, September 29, 2008
Truth Squad?
Sunday, September 28, 2008
No Credit for McCain
Greg Gutfeld Debate Commentary Excerpt
OKAY - LAST QUESTION - FINALLY - TERRORISM - THE MOST IMPORTANT DAMN QUESTION OF THE NIGHT!!Will there be another 9/11?(weird question, cuz you'd think it would be stupid for anyone to try to do it on that date, again. or, is it?)Both agree we are safer than before. So pat on the back for Bush.Funny - Bush solved the biggest problem we've encountered, so far.Obama mentioned "root cause," but correctly, finally.Wait. Obama just mentioned how "we" are perceived in the world, and how that affects terror. "We are less respected now." That statement betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the world. Terrorists will not stop blowing you up, because they "respect" you. Terrorists will not stop killing innocent people because they "like" you.They want to kill you, because you are NOT THEM.Terrorism is the tool to create heaven on earth for a group of fundamental nuts. The fact that they like you or not, has nothing to do with it.If anything, they leave you alone - if you kill them.
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Friday, September 26, 2008
My Duty as an anti-Obama American
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Honoring the Enemy?
Monday, September 22, 2008
Friday, September 19, 2008
Thursday, September 18, 2008
I'm Not Patriotic...

Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Wednesday's News
“For Barack Obama to argue that he’s experienced enough to be president because he’s running for president is desperate circular logic and its laughable. It is a testament to Barack Obama’s inexperience and failing qualifications that he would stoop to passing off his candidacy as comparable to Governor Sarah Palin’s executive experience managing a budget of over $10 billion and more than 24,000 employees,” said spokesman Tucker Bounds.
Sucker Punched?
I just removed a girl I went to high school with from my Facebook because she joined the group Stop Barack Obama: (one million strong against communism). I’ve never removed anyone before, and I’m all for celebrating differing political viewpoints, but flat-out ignorance is another thing all together. Communism? How can she not realize joining that group simply reveals her as an elitist idiot?
Friday, September 12, 2008
Harry Reid Sees the Future
On Racism
Thursday, September 11, 2008
NEVER FORGET: 9-11-01

"The attacks of September 11 were intended to break our spirit, instead we have emerged stronger and more unified. We feel renewed devotion to the principles of political, economic and religious freedom, the rule of law and respect for human life. We are more determined than ever to live our lives in freedom."
-Mayor Rudy Giuliani
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Wednesday's Pinheads


FoxForums:"Brits for Barack. Who Gives a Toss?"
Click here to read and discuss
Here is the first post by John Moody, Executive VP of Fox News:
“The world’s verdict will be harsh if the US rejects the man it yearns for.”
I had to read this headline in The Guardian, a British left-wing newspaper, twice, to make sure I wasn’t misinterpreting it. But sure enough, there was columnist Jonathan Freedland telling Americans how to vote. He said that, since Gov. Sarah Palin’s nomination at the GOP candidate for vice president, he felt at first “pessimistic.” That, he informs us, was quickly replaced by indignation as he saw that… people liked her!
Another fine America-hating British institution, the BBC, paid for a poll of 22,000 non-Americans to ask them who they wanted to be president. Guess what? Nearly one in two prefers Barack Obama. Only one in five wanted John McCain. That leaves 30% who had the right answer: they don’t know who should be president of our –- not their –- country.
Four years ago, a British writer made more news than he intended when he said that U.S. elections should be open to citizens of the whole world, since Americans had shown they weren’t smart enough to pick the right candidate.
Here’s a news flash: we don’t mind hearing what you think. But we still decide who will run our country. Not happy about that? Bit of hard luck.
I felt this post hit the spot. Bullseye. Whether foreigners want Obama or McCain, the bottom line is that they can't vote. It's our country. I also find it funny that the Brits want to take part in our election. In 1776, we broke away from them, now they want to join us?
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
O'Reilly interviews O'Bama

Part Three: Click here to watch
Monday, September 8, 2008
The tide turns...
By any measure, the Palin choice has been brilliant: both in how it has energized the conservative base of the Republican Party, and how it has attracted the irrational hatred of the liberal media. Thanks to her, McCain now leads Obama in an RCP average by 3.2 points, and in one poll by a margin of 10 points (USA Today/Gallup).
So what is it about Palin that attracts us to her? Is it the articulate manner in which she expresses her home-grown conservative values? Or maybe it's the wit with which she derides Obama's lack of experience (yes, Palin is more experienced than Obama)? These are rhetorical questions, of course. Palin stands on the right side of the issues. She is for lower taxes - not just for the middle class, but for everyone. She is against pork-barrel spending. She is for the right to life. In short, she practices and preaches Reagan conservatism.
Many are quick to forget that, in spite of the fact that we have had Republican presidents for 20 of the last 28 years, we have had only one conservative - Reagan. Even if we elect McCain, that number will remain the same. But by electing McCain, we are electing a conservative - Sarah Palin. America is a conservative nation. It's time to have another conservative in our higher offices.
Saturday, September 6, 2008
"Democrats are not caring for their Stars and Stripes"

U.S. Code says the proper method for disposing of an American flag is actually burning, provided it is “no longer a fitting emblem for display.”The United States Flag Store, which sells full-sized and miniature flags, says on its Web site that flags can also be put in the trash, when they are “worn, damaged or tattered beyond repair."
Friday, September 5, 2008
More viewers for McCain than Obama...
Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, Nielsen Media Research said. The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Democratic nominee Barack Obama last month. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate, drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.
What makes this even more exciting is the fact that McCain didn't have as many networks covering him as Obama did, further evidence that the media circus surrounding Obama has not guaranteed the "Messiah's" election.
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Wednesday's Obama Bashing RNC Speeches

GIULIANI SPEECH
HUCKABEE SPEECH
ROMNEY SPEECH
PALIN SPEECH
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Looney left wing media and Palin

Tuesday, September 2, 2008
So This is What Obama Supporters Are Like?
"Your "anti-obama" group is misnamed. I am more than sure that the president is just a figurehead. He is not promoting communism. Honestly, I think that if the other canidate gets elected that womans rights will go back to what they were 100 years ago. I understand that everyone has their own political views however, when it comes to these elections its a vote between two evils.
Stop being a racist redneck and pull your head out of your ass.
Thanks"
Oh boy, those are some pretty big claims there, so bear with me while I take them down one by one.
"Your "anti-obama" group is misnamed. I am more than sure that the president is just a figurehead. He is not promoting communism."
The admin of "Stop Barack Obama (One Million Strong Against Communism)" and I have both stated that we do not believe Obama is a communist. However, he does have many views that can be traced back to Marxism, socialism, and communism. The group was inherited by CJ from a previous admin, and therefore the name could not be changed. If the author of this message had taken the time to read through the group description, and maybe a post or two, she would have realized that the claim that she was making was ridiculous. And as for the president being a figurehead, there is no possible way she can be "more than sure" that he is a figurehead. A figurehead is someone meant to represent something, but with no actual power. I'm more than sure that the President of the United States of America is NOT a figurehead, and that he is the leader of the executive branch of the government. Unless someone can give me solid proof that the President is a figurehead, I find that claim to be utterly ridiculous.
"Honestly, I think that if the other canidate gets elected that womans rights will go back to what they were 100 years ago."
Can anybody show me McCain's plans for revoking women's suffrage, and all their other rights? I don't think so. I find it odd that the candidate with a female running mate can, at the same time, be the one pushing to strip women of their rights. Is it even possible for someone who respected a woman enough to ask her to run for vice-president alongside him, despite all the "problems" the media is beginning to expose with her personal life, to think she deserves no rights at the same time? That claim is laughable at best.
"I understand that everyone has their own political views however, when it comes to these elections its a vote between two evils."
McCain was not my first choice for the Republican presidential candidate, that would be Rudy Giuliani. However, this election is not an election between two evils. It is an election between views that will benefit the country and views that will help the country into rapid decline. Many people aren't able to determine which side has which of the aforementioned views. I personally believe that most of John McCain's views will benefit the country, while many of Barack Obama's views will only weaken the U.S.A. But as she said, everyone has their own political views.
"Stop being a racist redneck and pull your head out of your ass."
That one sentence was the main reason I decided to rant about this message. For those of you that don't know what a redneck is, like the author of this message, here is the definition according to Dictionary.com:
1. an uneducated white farm laborer, esp. from the South.
2. a bigot or reactionary, esp. from the rural working class.
–adjective
3. Also, red-necked. narrow, prejudiced, or reactionary: a redneck attitude.
Now then, I am far from uneducated, yes I am white, but I am not a farm laborer, and since when was New York in the south? Definition one definitely does not describe me.
I am not intolerant of any opposing beliefs and opinions, and I do not oppose change, I just oppose the bad change Obama offers. So there goes the idea that I'm a bigot and a reactionary. So definition two doesn't fit either.
My views are not narrow and prejudiced, and we already learned that I'm not a reactionary. I'm very open to new ideas, if someone can prove to me that something will work better than something else, I'll accept the idea. I am a conservative because people have proved to me, and I have seen for myself, that many liberal ideas will not work. So there goes definition three.
Now to look into the claim that I am racist. I love that I can have friends among every racial group imaginable, believe that skin pigmentation is not something that should separate people in the world, but the second I refuse to support Barack Obama, who isn't entirely African American himself, I become a racist. For the record, I support John McCain and not Barack Obama because I agree more with McCain's views. If McCain was black I would support him just as much as I do now. As I stated before, race shouldn't matter.
To sum up my reaction to the statement that I am "a racist redneck" and need to "pull [my] head out of [my] ass." I think that the author of the message is the one who needs to pull their head out of their ass, and stop making such outrageous claims because of who I support, don't support and how I choose to voice my opinion until they do their research.
"Thanks"
No no no, thank YOU! Thank you for providing me with this perfect topic starter. Thank you for making me think that many Obama supporters do not know what they're talking about and only vote for this man because they don't want to be labeled as a racist. Thank you for being a complete and total idiot and making it possible for me to tear your hate-mail apart piece by piece. Thank you very, very much.
Monday, September 1, 2008
Super Vlad Saves the Day!

Saturday, August 30, 2008
MORE ON THE BIASED LEFT WING MEDIA
You may also be thinking: 'Well who does this punk think he is talking about the MSM being biased when this blog is completely biased?'
Well I'm sorry but this is not Fox News (Fair and Balanced). This is a blog called 'Stop Barack Obama' and it is meant to be tilted to the right. However I use Fox News as a News source because it has no spin, unlike the MSM.
Friday, August 29, 2008
Congratulations to Sarah Palin, McCain's VP

- Republican: Palin will please the Conservative voters
- Alaskan Governor: Palin will aid McCain in the energy crisis and hopefully have some influence on drilling in Alaska
- Pro-life: Her fifth child was born with down-syndrome, but she declined an abortion. Good Job Palin! She gets the vote from Christians and other Pro-lifers. This will also wake some people up and show them that woman CAN be pro-life.
- 44 years of age: She is younger than Obama...now let's see who really has the hope and new stuff? Although Palin was only elected Governor in 2006, she still has more executive experience than Obama, plus a 13 year political background.
- WOMAN: Now we all know there are going to be those folks who are only voting based on race/gender. Well, hopefully the Hillary supporters and women will definitely vote for McCain/Palin. Remember Palin is also a mother of five, so she can relate to the people. (Her oldest is going to serve in Iraq)
- Palin has an 80% approval rating as governor of Alaska
- Palin is a lifelong NRA member
- 1984: Sarah Palin, then Sarah Heath was Miss Wasilla
-John McCain
-Gov. Sarah Palin
- FOX NEWS: Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the GOP's Newest Star (JULY 11, 2007)
- FOX NEWS: SARAH PALIN SEEN AS GOP RISING STAR (AUGUST 29, 2008)
- FOX NEWS: MCCAIN NAMES ALASKA GOV. PALIN AS RUNNING MATE
- FOX NEWS: PHOTOS