Monday, October 27, 2008
Follow Up: 10/27 Pinhead
Sucker Punched Pt. 2
Like print newspapers and newspaper websites, blogs can gain reputations based on its content, ideologies, and presentation. For example, blogging infused with malicious sarcasm, like http://stopbarackobama-group.blogspot.com/ will hopefully not gain respect from most readers. This particular blog responds to and dismisses readers’ objections to its content more than it posts original content. It also consistently calls its objectors stupid, in one way or another. This demonstrates the importance of readers’ ability to comment on blogs, and its effect on journalism. If a blogger responds to readers’ comments by churning low blows to their level of intelligence, the blogger will undermine his or her own purposes. The “Stop Obama” blog will not persuade supporters of Obama to change their minds by calling his supporters dumb. Though this blog provides readers with news, its loyalty is not to “the citizens” but rather to “the cause.” Perhaps that is the difference between blogging and journalistic blogging.Click here to read the original post.
Art or a Churlish Act?
.jpg)
Sunday, October 26, 2008
NO Tough Questions!
FOX NEWS: 'Obama Campaign Cuts Off Interviews With Florida TV Stations'
Watch the interview:
Biden Angered By Tough Questions
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Friday, October 24, 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Orson Scott Card asks the question...
http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/081017light.html
If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.
If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.
If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate.
Because that's what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don't like the probable consequences. That's what honesty means . That's how trust is earned.If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats — including Barack Obama — and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans — then you are not journalists by any standard.
You're just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it's time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Brace Yourselves!
"Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."Oh boy can't wait.
Monday, October 20, 2008
'Family Guy' in the tank
Friday, October 17, 2008
Vote Obama, or else you are a RACIST!
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Joe on MSNBC
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Debate Tonite...no drunken commentary.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Raving Loons on the Factor...Again
"Ein Volk, Ein BarReich, Ein Obama"
"Her son, she said, doesn't understand her concern.Obviously the schools are becoming successful in brainwashing the youth..."Give me the youth, and Germany will rule the World" - Adolf Hitler
"It worries me that, you know, he's in eighth grade and already he's thinking that Obama is just going to win because everybody likes him," she said. "Why in a school does everybody like him? I've got to believe there are kids who like McCain too.""
"But the left realizes that if you want to kill a legitimate line of questioning, simply call something racist or hateful - and the media nods. It's the best way to make sure McCain loses gracefully – and it's working.
Frankly, I'd say it makes them all worse than Hitler."
Mickey Endorses Obama

Monday, October 13, 2008
Obama, of Sherwood Forest
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Introducing our next VP...John McCain!
Monday, October 6, 2008
'Obama Frat'
Saturday, October 4, 2008
Why do the American people trust Obama with the economy?
Obama – 47%
McCain – 37%
Do these numbers worry anyone else? McCain’s gaffe during the Republican primary season aside, since when have we trusted a man who leans so far left of center with our money?
Obama wants to give tax credits to the American people. This is much different from cutting taxes (as much as he denies it) because money must first be taken in by the government before it is paid out. Obama’s plans sound like welfare for those of us who don’t need it.
There are plenty of people who find it appropriate, even necessary, that we tax the rich in order to even out the distribution of wealth in America, as if the vast majority of those we call rich have lied, cheated and stolen in order to acquire their wealth. Or that all the rich have simply come about their money by way of inheritance, and therefore do not deserve it. Do we really believe this, as Americans? Polls seem to indicate that we do.
America is a meritocracy. We rise and fall by our own hands. We believe that all men are created equal, not that they are equally entitled to the fruits of one another’s labors. Yet here we are, as a combined group of some three hundred million people, leaning in the direction of a man who does not believe in merit, but in handouts. In taking from one group, whether they like it or not, and forcing them to give to another. Is that America? Is this a country that forcibly rips the gains of one group of people and hands them to another?
Taking from the rich does not benefit anyone in the long term. For the time being it feels good to have the extra cash in hand, but the unseen effects of such policies are great: reduced innovation, a stagnant standard of living. These are the true costs of taxing the “rich.” For some reason people seem to believe that they are not living as good of lives as they were in the past. This is a very peculiar idea, because just fifteen years ago the Internet was still in its infancy. Now, we use it for our everyday lives – to make hotel reservations, purchase tickets, buy clothes, read our news…in short, do everything. Go back to the 1930’s and 40’s, and see how many people owned a color television set. Or a car with a GPS. Innovation increases our standard of living in a way that mere numbers can’t convey – and by taxing the rich and corporations, the incentive to innovate disappears. After all, why innovate if you won’t see any reward? If people are out to help one another, why haven’t all the communal societies of the past produced the technological advances of the United States? Why didn’t the Soviet Union turn out as the superpower of the 20th Century, and the hegemon of the 21st?
I’ll leave off this post with one final thought: if you look back in history, you’ll see another government that actively gave the people money out of the government coffers – the Roman Empire. If the people wish to be coddled, as the citizens of Rome were coddled, that is their right to do so. But we ought to keep in mind the lessons of that time, notably the result that followed.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Sing Praises for...Obama?
(and if you disagree with me, you sir are worse than Hitler!)
Teachers <3 Obama

Read First:
FOX NEWS: "Virginia Teachers Union Sparks Outrage With 'Obama Blue Day'"